Monday, 10 November 2008

Workcover under attack

On October 8, around 500 workplace delegates and occupational health and
safety representatives attended a meeting called by the Victorian Trades
Hall Council (VTHC).

The meeting was called in response to a list of changes to the current Work
Cover legislation recommended by Peter Hanks QC, commissioned last year
to conduct an inquiry into the 1985 Workers Compensation Act.

The government of then-premier Jeff Kennett made a number of changes
to Victoria’s Accident Compensation Act, greatly reducing injured workers’
access to compensation and decreasing their entitlements. It was not until
2006 that the state Labor government declared it would “review the
Accident Compensation Act 1985 to ensure workers receive the assistance,
support and benefits they deserve”.

Now, after nine years of promises, Hanks’ final report seeks to further
diminish the entitlements of injured workers. Among the proposals made
is a change in the law to exclude workers from stress-related claims, if the
stress comes from any “reasonable management action”.

According to the VTHC this will knock out 90% of claims. Unions say all
injuries should be covered by a “no-fault” system. Hanks also proposes
occupational health and safety reps, instead of unions, advocate for injured
workers returning to work, effectively strengthening employers’ ability to
deny workers the right to return to their jobs.

It also proposes to strip the present dispute resolution system
and have courts to hear disputes — a process that would add years to
dispute resolution and leave workers without money and medical treatment.

The meeting moved a motion opposing all recommendations not considered
by the unions to be in the best interests of workers and demanded that the
government reach agreement with the VTHC on key issues. If these demands
are not met, the VTHC has vowed to take further action.

From: Alistair McKinnon, Melbourne,11 October ,2008.
Australian News, Green Left Weekly issue #770 15 October 2008.

No comments: