Workcover cuts may increase suicide rate

Workstream News - December 2006

Dozens of seriously injured, long-term WorkCover recipients are having their
payments reduced or stopped by the authority in an “unfair” process that
could leave some suicidal, according to industry experts.

According to lawyer Paul Mulvany, the principal of Workforce Legal and
former judge of Victoria’s Accident Compensation Tribunal, who has had
more than 30 years’ experience with WorkCover there had been
improvements to the authority in recent years, but there remained
“pockets of sub-standard performance” including “inappropriate
determinations” for long-term claimants.

State legislation requires WorkCover to reassess injured workers at least
every two years, but recently the authority had a project to reduce the
number of long-term claimants, Mr Mulvany said.

He likened the reassessment process to “rolling the dice”. Those who
had poor rulings could seek a review through a WorkCover-funded
conciliation process, an independent medical panel or the courts.
Mr Mulvany estimated that 70 per cent of those who fought their
assessments had them overturned on appeal. “The story is they get it
wrong a lot of the time,” he said.

Another lawyer, Patsy Toop, said four clients had lost benefits in the
past 12 months. “It’s appalling when you consider that the Victorian
WorkCover Authority made a billion-dollar profit this year that they
would be attacking those people who are long-term recipients of
WorkCover benefits,” she said.

Leading WorkCover practitioners have called for greater transparency
and care by the authority and its doctors, whose reassessments have
denied some long-term claimants payments and treatment after more
than 10 years of regular benefits.

Workers’ Occupational Health Centre physician Helen Sutcliffe estimated
up to 50 seriously injured workers would have had their benefits reduced
following adverse reassessments.

“I don’t think there’s any doubt that many long-term WorkCover recipients
are being targeted,” she said. While a re-examination of claims was
reasonable, the way it was done was “inappropriate” and “unfair”
for quite a number of people, she said.

Dr Sutcliffe said some had been left in such vulnerable position
physically, mentally and financially that she “wouldn’t be surprised
if there are suicides as a result of this”.

Trades Hall WorkCover Officer Jarrod Moran said there was “room
for improvement” in the treatment of long-term claimants, who were
the most dependent on the WorkCover scheme.

WorkCover Minister Tim Holding would not respond to the criticism.
A Victorian WorkCover Authority spokesman said it had to ensure
people received appropriate benefits. Reassessments could be appealed
to a free conciliation service or medical panel, while the Australian
Medical Association handled complaints about doctors.

Work factors in Suicide Study

WCV's would like to thank the "Urban Ministry Network" and specifically
Mr John Bottomley for being kind enough to supply us with a copy of
his 3 year study. We will closely read this study and post it as soon as
possible.

Workcover cuts may increase suicide rate

Dozens of seriously injured, long-term WorkCover recipients are having
their payments reduced or stopped by the authority in an "unfair" process
that could leave some suicidal, according to industry experts.

According to lawyer Paul Mulvany, the principal of Workforce Legal and
former judge of Victoria’s Accident Compensation Tribunal, who has had
more than 30 years’ experience with WorkCover believes there had been
improvements to the authority in recent years, but there remained "pockets
of sub-standard performance" including "inappropriate determinations"
for long-term claimants.

State legislation requires WorkCover to reassess injured workers at least
every two years, but recently the authority had a project to reduce the number
of long-term claimants, Mr Mulvany said. He likened the reassessment process
to "rolling the dice". Those who had poor rulings could seek a review through
a WorkCover-funded conciliation process, an independent medical panel or
the courts.

Mr Mulvany estimated that 70 per cent of those who fought their assessments
had them overturned on appeal. "The story is they get it wrong a lot of the time,"
he said.

Another lawyer, Patsy Toop, said four clients had lost benefits in the past 12 months.
"It’s appalling when you consider that the Victorian WorkCover Authority
made a billion-dollar profit this year that they would be attacking those people
who are long-term recipients of WorkCover benefits," she said.

Leading WorkCover practitioners have called for greater transparency and
care by the authority and its doctors, whose reassessments have denied some
long-term claimants payments and treatment after more than 10 years of
regular benefits.

Workers’ Occupational Health Centre physician Helen Sutcliffe estimated
up to 50 seriously injured workers would have had their benefits reduced
following adverse reassessments. "I don’t think there’s any doubt that
many long-term WorkCover recipients are being targetted," she said.
While a re-examination of claims was reasonable, the way it was done was
"inappropriate" and "unfair" for quite a number of people, she said.

Dr Sutcliffe said some had been left in a such vulnerable position physically,
mentally and financially that she "wouldn’t be surprised if there’s suicides
as a result of this".

Trades Hall WorkCover officer Jarrod Moran said there was "room for
improvement" in the treatment of long-term claimants, who were the most
dependent on the WorkCover scheme.

WorkCover Minister Tim Holding would not respond to the criticism.

A Victorian WorkCover Authority spokesman said it had to ensure people
received appropriate benefits. Reassessments could be appealed to a free
conciliation service or medical panel, while the Australian Medical Association
handled complaints about doctors.